BoatBlue.org

Testimonials

What Does Congress Think of Permitting Boaters?

 
“We are going to make sure that individual boaters do not need permits—that’s as simple as it gets. That’s my commitment, and it will happen.”
 
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California)
Chairperson of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee & Sponsor of S. 2766, the Clean Boating Act of 2008
 
 
“They've never been required to have such a permit, and there's no reason for that to change...Florida has almost a million boaters…it's vitally important to them, and to me, that we continue a reasonable, commonsense exemption for recreational boating and sport fishing. You shouldn't have to ask the EPA before you take your boat out on the water.”
 
Senator Bill Nelson (D-Florida)
Sponsor of S. 2766, the Clean Boating Act of 2008
 
"Requiring family boaters to secure a Clean Water Act permit so that they can wash their boat, fish, or go waterskiing is ridiculous. This permit requirement is unnecessary and onerous. If allowed to take effect, it will be costly and essentially unenforceable."
 
Senator Mel Martinez (R-Florida)
Sponsor of S.2067, the Recreational Boating Act of 2007
 
 
“The court ruling swept small and recreational boats into the same category as cargo ships, forcing boaters to require a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.  This is clearly not the intention of the law, or the EPA.  It is a costly oversight that must be fixed. I fully understand that the law was not intended to prevent boaters from enjoying this American past time.  It is important we make sure we protect our environment from pollutants, however recreational boating should be simple, safe and fun.”
 
Representative Gene Taylor (D-Mississippi)
Co-chair of the Congressional Boating Caucus & Sponsor of H.R. 2550, the Recreational Boating Act of 2007
 
 
“It is ludicrous that boaters who practice safe and environmentally sound boating could be subjected to these kinds of costs. There is a reason that recreational boaters have been exempted for years, and that is because they pose absolutely no threat to the environment. These regulations would be bad for recreational boaters and bad for the boating industry…”
 
Representative Candice Miller (R-Michigan)
Co-chair of the Congressional Boating Caucus & Sponsor of H.R. 2550, the Recreational Boating Act of 2007 
 
 

How about the Groups that Started the Ballast Water Lawsuit?

 
‘…The initiator of the lawsuit, Northwest Environmental Advocates, believes that the thrust of the regulations will focus on oceangoing vessels, the crux of the problem, said Nina Bell, executive director of the Portland-based group. "We're concerned, too," she said of the domestic boating industry's concerns.’
 
The Sacramento Bee, April 4, 2007
 
 
‘…One of the Pacific Coast commercial fishing groups that petitioned the EPA to beef up its ballast-water regulations said Thursday he is concerned that the decision is now being applied to small-boat owners. "This could be extremely onerous when the discharges are essentially benign," said Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman's Associations.’
 
Anchorage Daily News, July 20, 2007
 
 
‘…The move comes after a lawsuit filed by 12 parties, including the Great Lakes Sport Fishing Council (GLFSC). After the EPA refused the group’s petition in 1999 to require ballast-water permits for commercial shipping under the Clean Water Act, the confederation successfully sued the EPA to force it to rescind a permit exemption it granted to commercial shippers.  The problem, said Dan Thomas of the GLFSC, was that the judge also rescinded the exemption for recreational vessels, something which no one saw coming.’
 
Ludington Daily News, July 18, 2007
 
 
“We do not believe that it is necessary or appropriate at this time for the USEPA to include recreational boats as pollution sources needing NPDES permits by September 30, 2008.”
 
The State of Michigan, in Comments to the EPA, August 3, 2007
 

Latest News

More News »